Archive for March, 2005

Next on the List…

Tuesday, March 29th, 2005

I have a small but satisfying collection of modern pistol, with a representative each from the SIG, Glock, Beretta, and the 1911 families. I even have the XD, which combines features from three out of those four.

I’m thinking that the next guns in line are:

  • A CZ-75
  • An HK P7
  • A .357 revolver, probably a S&W of some kind, maybe a Ruger.

Then I’m done! Well, except for small carry guns (a Kahr K9 maybe). And anything else that strikes my fancy :-)

It looks like the collection is developing along the lines of “significant 20th century small arms” that “I happen to like”.

Stance Visualization?

Tuesday, March 29th, 2005

Was just thinking today that’s there’s been a progression in how I visualize my two-handed stance.

(more…)

Basics Basics Basics

Monday, March 28th, 2005

There are three homilies that I hear repeated in “how to shoot” instructional guides:

  • Lock the Wrist
  • Squeeze the Trigger
  • Focus on the Front Sight

Well, I think I am finally starting to understand them.

Locking the wrist I thought I was doing that, but actually I wasn’t. I believe now that locking the wrist means you try to make your entire hand assembly one gripping, unmoving vise. I’ve heard it described that way elsewhere, but the natural tendency is to adjust your wrist to help aim the gun so you don’t move your head as much. No no no…I think this is probably wrong. You develop the vise grip first, so the gun’s barrel is in line with your arm, and then you get your head and eyes behind the sights. With practice, I think you end up with a natural pointing motion in a more aggressive stance. And as you’re firing, focus on maintaining that vise grip and arrow-straight orientation of barrel to arm. I think it took about a year for me to realize this also, because I had the tendency not to use the tip of my finger. As it is, my fingers are kind of short for fuller-sized autos (the SIG P226’s long DA first trigger pull requires me to use tip of my finger). But the grip is good and the recoil is more manageable.

Squeezing the trigger is trickier than it sounds. I think it’s taken about a year for me to develop the finger strength and dexterity to pull off a smooth squeeze. Secondly, I had to develop the coordination between grip and pull. By focusing on the back of my hand, where the backstrap of the grip meets, I can actually better “index” the pull straight back. If I think about keeping steady pressure on the backstrap, I find that this results in more of a squeeze than if I am thinking about my index finger. Weird, I know.

Keeping your focus on the Front Sight…easy to do as you’re lining up. But are you really focusing on the sight, or just lining it up and looking at the target? I found that I was doing this. Plus, when you start to squeeze the trigger and are thinking about locking your wrist and the backstrap and not flinching…it’s easy for your attention to wander. I’ve tried using the front sight as a kind of mental anchor for the entire process…can’t tell if it’s working or not. Also, focusing on the front sight during recoil and recovery helps line things back up faster, I think. I haven’t timed or video taped myself, so I’m not really sure.

I am still have trouble keeping all these thing simultaneously…more practice I guess. Maybe I need to develop a mantra like “lock — front sight - squeeze - vise grip - front sight front sight - BOOM - lock front sight - squeeze”. Or put it to music or something. If I do it 100 times, maybe it will stick.

Then, maybe I can develop better speed. I suspect I need to practice acquiring a sight picture faster. Front sight focus might help, in addition to practicing a consistent draw and fire.

Japanese Shooting Tour

Sunday, March 27th, 2005

I stumbled across this link while looking up some stuff about SIGs, this Japanese Desert Shooting Tour in Las Vegas. It appears to cater to gun enthusiasts in Japan who aren’t allowed to own the real thing. The babelfish-translated page seems to verify this. I found the link page interesting to browse through…the shooting tour’s sponsor is apparently “Gun Magazine”. They seem to have devoted entire special issues to things like the 2005 Shot Show. A whole issue! We just get a few pages in our magazines.

Saturday Evening Shooting

Sunday, March 27th, 2005

Got a call out of the blue from Al, who unfortunately lives in Massachusetts. He was in the area and wanted to do some shooting. So I headed to MFL with a bagful of handguns and several hundred rounds of ammunition. We shot mostly at 5 to 10 yards, just having a good time.

It’s been instructive to bring my friends into the range and try to help them shoot better. I’m not much further along than them, but the act of explaining what I’m doing helps me shoot better. Al’s stance was kind of hunched up, so we straightened that up a bit. Al also had a slight-but-consistent flinching problem that we eventually got to go away. The biggest insight for him was to focus on the front sight, not the target. His groups became more accurate and precise. Even with the flinching problem, Al’s groups weren’t that bad for a third-time shooter…they were all on the paper inside the A zone (or what we considered good) at 5YDs. At 10YDs, it would have been a problem.

We had four guns: the Glock 34, the Kimber TLE, the Springfield XD, and the Ruger Mk III w/ optical sight. Al rocked the house with the Kimber…it’s a great gun. I even shot it pretty well today (at 5YD, anyway). We were not all that thrilled with the Ruger (it’s a .22LR) and put it away pretty quick. Al liked the Glock better than the XD; he commented how interesting it was that each gun had a distinctly different feel.

It was a busy day at the range incidentally, lots of people. We had called ahead to reserve a lane as members are allowed to do, but we still had to wait.

Afterwards, I bought that used SIG P226 in 40. Then we washed up and got huge burgers at Ruby Tuesday. Not a bad day out.

SIG Temptation

Thursday, March 24th, 2005

MFL is having a sale on some 2 year-old SIGs in various calibers. They’re range guns, had their springs replaced and the works looked over. They’re ranging from the mid $300s to the mid $400s. It’s mighty tempting to pick on up in .40, since I don’t have anything in that caliber. Plus I could get a .357SIG barrel for it. And, as far as pistols go, it would be nice to have an example in the armory. They’re a bit beat up, but that just makes them cooler :-)

Aw heck, I should go check them out tomorrow. Maybe they’ll rattle like tin cans filled with rocks when I pick them up, and I can stop thinking about them.

UPDATE: All of them were sold out except for one…the 226 in .40SW I was eyeing before. I ended up getting it…it was about $450. As a bonus, it even sits fairly well in the Tucker “Answer” for XD holster…they are somewhat similarly shaped. Just your standard black SIG P226, visible wear and chips, but I’m not that interested in cosmetics. The mechanism itself is sound…I like the trigger on it too. Looking forward to shooting it.

Concentration

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2005

I’ve been having a few terrible weeks of shooting, which means I think I’m about to hit the next level. Here’s what I think is going on:

  1. I finally learn how to hold a pistol stable and pull the trigger, by putting my concentration on the backstrap instead of the trigger as I pull. Don’t know if this works for everyone, but it seems to work for me.

  2. During monday night shoots, a marked increase in accuracy on the stages. Am encouraged to try to push a little faster.

  3. Result, three weeks of marked decrease in accuracy. This week, I slowed it down in the middle of the session to re-focus on the basics of 1.

Also, I am now starting to move on load and draw. I realized today, watching some of the more experienced shooters, that I lacked a certain fluidity in both motion and awareness. I was not “in the game”.

So, rather than focus on speed, I’m going to focus on the basics and fluidity in motion, awareness, and sequence of action. There’s a certain rhythm that you need to have. Speed should come after that. I feel better now for having completely missed one plate at 7 yards.

The one high point of the evening was a shoot-from-cover exercise in which I went empty (duh), and then executed a very fast (for me) reload without having to think about it. I just did it. Didn’t stare at the gun. Saw it, dropped the mag while feeding the new one, racked and finished off the stage. The RO even said it looked great, even as I washed out.

“The Answer” Reloaded

Tuesday, March 8th, 2005

The Modification

I shot from my Tucker Gunleather “The Answer” holster at practice last Monday, after wearing it around the house for a couple of weeks. It’s comfortable, fast, and I forgot it was there. It being my first IWB holster, I don’t have much to compare it by, but the experience has been very positive. I’d buy one again.

There was, however, one thing that kind of bugged me. As the night wore on, and my pants drooped a little more, the gun felt like it a bit on the loose side. I noticed this in particular when I was doing things like turning and shooting from behind cover. The gun didn’t fall out, but I found I was less confident in my movement. Maybe it’s a double-edged benefit of the design: it allows the pistol to shift slightly as you move around without binding while retaining it in place due to the pressure of the leather pad against the gun against the kydex retaining shell. This means its comfortable and quiet, but it isn’t as aggressive a hold as you’d get from a full kydex holster shell.

Upside Down Retention w/ Springfield Armory XD And one thing you definitely can’t do with “The Answer” is hold it upside down with the gun in it…it’ll fall right out. I just modified mine to add more positive retention.


Th The original holster (ordered from Pistol-Gear) has kydex on only one side of the trigger guard. In the image you can see how there are two plastic tubes that are adjustable (to a point, before they bore through the back of the leather). There’s a detent in the kydex as you’d expect, which provides the “grab” on the front of the trigger guard to keep the gun in place.

It’s not as grabby as full kydex holsters, because of its one-sided construction, but it works pretty well. Your body presses against the gun, which forces the trigger guard to touch the kydex. Plus, the leather is providing friction, so the gun is pretty well in place.

The Answer, Modified My modified holster adds a piece of plastic from my Uncle Mike’s Kydex OWB holster, which I had retired because it scratches up the takedown level of my XD. Here’s what the salvaged plastic looks like in place. You can see how it now grips just the front of the XD’s trigger guard.

As an additional bonus, the rubber spacers from the Uncle Mike’s holster are shorter by just the right amount to replace the original ones without deforming “The Answer’s” geometry. And the retention screws are threaded exactly the same, but are shorter, so they work better. The only difference is that they’re not allen wrench heads, but use a regular phillips head screw. The contrast in screws actually looks pretty cool in my opinion. So now, as with the Uncle Mike’s R.I.P. holster, I can adjust the retention from very loose to very tight.

Side Facing Gun Side Facing Leather Here’s what the piece of plastic looks like, before installation. I used a dremel tool to carve it out of the Uncle Mike’s. You can see that new holes had to be drilled, and I rounded off the edges so they wouldn’t scuff up the leather. Yes, I’m not very good at using power tools. The trickiest part was to figure out the alignment so the two grippy detentes were lined up correctly.


Installed Here’s what it looks like installed.


Now I have the adjustable snappier retention of the Uncle Mike’s and the comfort of “The Answer”. Due to where the plastic is installed, the leather is still free to mold itself in whatever way it wants in exactly the same way it could before. I can hold the holster upside down, and the gun doesn’t fall out. One-handed reholstering hasn’t been affected, and there hasn’t been a problem with the new plastic getting in the way of the gun (I ramped the edges anyway just to be sure).

One thing I might have done is shorten the piece of plastic toward the muzzle end of the gun so its rigidity wouldn’t prevent the leather from moving in that direction. I haven’t noticed a problem yet. Another improvement might be to sand the leather-facing side flatter, as it “dips” a bit and deforms the leather slightly. The Uncle Mike’s holster design though is still pretty flat in this area, so it’s not too bad. In retrospect, any reasonably thick, flat piece of plastic would have done; it probably wasn’t necessary to cut up the Uncle Mike’s holster, though I wasn’t planning on using it on any guns ever again due to its construction flaw.

I’m pretty pleased with this modification so far. Will see how it works out in practice.

UPDATE October 23, 2005:

I noticed a bump in traffic from the fine people at GlockTalk discussing this very page. Howdy! I’ve been using the modded holster for about a year without any problems, but I don’t carry on a daily basis. The retention isn’t exactly “clicky” like it is with a full-shell design; your body is still providing the majority of the retention by pressing the gun against the shell, so it’s a little muffled. I haven’t noticed any difference in performance.

The biggest advantage? When you’re going to the bathroom and have to urinate standing up, you don’t have to worry about your gun falling out onto the bathroom floor or into the toilet or worse. I carry mine at around 5 o’clock with an extreme cant for better concealability, so having that extra retention helps keep your hands free so you can “stay on target”.

I have chosen to adjust the retention on mine so it’s just grabby enough to hold the gun when upside down, but not much more than that. I did this in the past because the retention screws that came with my Answer were a little too long…if I adjusted the retention tighter, the screws would start poking up through the leather! The Uncle Mike’s screws were shorter so I can aggressively tighten, so I’m using those instead. If they are just .5 to 1 mill shorter, that would work.

Bad Names

Sunday, March 6th, 2005

Today I found out that “blammer” means “blog spammer”. I guess I’ll be changing the name to something else when this registration runs out.

Holsters, Again

Wednesday, March 2nd, 2005

So far, I’m finding the Tucker “The Answer” IWB holster to be very comfortable in “around the house” testing. I’ve become pretty used to the way it sits. It’s fast to draw from, and easy to reholster one-handed. I still wonder if the retention could be a little more positive, but one advantage is that it’s pretty quiet…not “snap” noise.

During range drills, the Uncle Mike’s Kydex holster is feeling less and less comfortable. It’s a straight-draw, and it just feels so much bulkier now. Plus, there’s a brass rivet that is now scratching the takedown lever on every draw. A small plastic ridge around the rivet used to prevent this, but after a couple hundred draws, it’s worn completely away. One good piece of news is that the brass discoloring on the lever is actually from the rivet, not the gun. The leather in the Tucker holster has actually polished it away.

Maybe I shouldn’t be so surprised that I like the Tucker better…it costs 6 times as much as the Uncle Mike’s at 115 bucks versus 20 bucks.